Read the whole record. Then argue with it.
Each analysis reads every page and every transcript in the case, not a sample, and works from the defense perspective. Findings are structured, ranked, and cited to the document and page or the media timestamp.
Body-camera timestamp shows the front door opened at 21:12:047. The warrant bears a signature time of 21:311. The incident report gives entry as 21:403. No document explains the discrepancy.
The initial report says rights were read “at the scene”3; the supplemental report, filed nine days later, says “prior to the recorded interview at the station.”4 The interview recording begins mid-conversation and does not capture a warning.8
The property receipt lists the item as “submitted for latent processing”11, but no lab report appears in the production.
The analysis set
Timeline
Every dated or timestamped event in the record, merged into one chronology, with the source for each entry and conflicts flagged where two sources disagree.
Summary
A defense-oriented brief of the case: charges, theory of the prosecution, key witnesses and evidence, and the open questions.
Contradictions and weaknesses
Where the record disagrees with itself, and where the State's case is thin. Each finding is ranked and cited.
Cross-reference
Pin the key facts (a plate, a phone number, a name, a time) and trace every place each one appears across the whole record, including transcripts and photos.
Investigative gaps
What a thorough investigation would have done and did not: unpulled footage, uninterviewed witnesses, untested items, unrequested records.
Temporal patterns
Patterns in when documents were created, modified and filed, such as reports written days after the fact or clustered right before a hearing.
Warrant scope
Reads each warrant against what was actually searched and seized, and flags items outside the authorized scope, place or time.
Entity links
People, vehicles, phones, addresses and accounts, and how the record connects them.
Full case review
Runs every analysis in sequence and writes a master overview on top, ready to export as a single branded report.
- 911 call reports a disturbance at 1412 Larkspur Ct. 2
- Body camera: officers open the front door. 7 conflicts with [3]
- Search warrant signed by the duty judge. 1
- Incident report: “entry made.” 3 conflicts with [7]
- Recorded interview begins at the station. 8
- Supplemental report filed. 4
Versioned, re-runnable, exportable
Every analysis is saved with the date it ran and the evidence it saw. Add a new production and re-run; the old version stays on file so you can see what changed. Each report can be exported as Word, PDF or plain text, with your review notes appended.
- Findings are ranked by severity and grouped by theme
- Citations open the source page or jump to the media timestamp
- Analyses can be run against a what-if scenario instead of the permanent record
- Reports are written for the attorney: plain language, no jargon, nothing invented